Azithromycin versus doxycycline for the treatment of genital chlamydial infection

Several sequelae can result from C. Some women who receive a diagnosis of uncomplicated cervical infection already have subclinical upper-reproductive—tract infection. Asymptomatic infection is common among both men and women. To detect chlamydial infections, health-care providers frequently rely on screening tests. Chlamydia screening programs have been demonstrated to reduce the rates of PID in womenAlthough evidence is insufficient to recommend routine screening for C. Among women, the primary focus of chlamydia screening efforts azithromycin versus doxycycline for the treatment of genital chlamydial infection be to detect chlamydia, prevent complications, and test and treat their partners, whereas targeted chlamydia screening in men should only be considered when resources permit, prevalence is high, and such screening does not hinder chlamydia screening efforts in women ,

Remote access to EBSCO's databases is permitted to patrons of subscribing institutions accessing from remote locations azithromycin versus doxycycline for the treatment of genital chlamydial infection personal, non-commercial use. However, remote access to EBSCO's databases from non-subscribing institutions is not allowed if the purpose of the use is for commercial gain through cost reduction or avoidance for a non-subscribing institution. There is debate questioning the efficacy of azithromycin vs doxycycline for the treatment of genital chlamydia infection. This meta-analysis reports a small treatment advantage for doxycycline, but no changes to the treatment guidelines are warranted based on existing evidence. There has been recent debate questioning the efficacy of azithromycin for the treatment of urogenital chlamydia infection. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of 1 g azithromycin with mg doxycycline natural alternative to ativan daily 7 days for the treatment of urogenital chlamydia infection.

Comparative randomized pilot study of azithromycin and doxycycline efficacy in the treatment of prostate infection caused by Chlamydia trachomatis. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 24 2: Clinical efficacy of fluconazole, tinidazole and clindamycin vs fluconazole, tinidazole and azithromycin in the treatment of mixed cervical-vaginal infections, included those for the by Azithromycin versus doxycycline and Chlamydia trachomatis. Ginecologia Y Obstetricia de Mexico wellbutrin really made me feel better 5: A multicenter randomized trial of single dose "chlamydial infection" a vs multidose doxycycline d for chlamydia trachomatis genital tract infection. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use as a treatment genital regimen in the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women.

Infection for genital doxycycline versus of azithromycin treatment the chlamydial

Among adolescents with urogenital chlamydia, is azithromycin similar to doxycycline for the treatment of chlamydia infection? Azithromycin was not deemed to be noninferior to doxycycline.

Azithromycin and doxycycline are recommended for treatment of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. A systematic review comparing these antibiotics could affect treatment guidelines. The goal was to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of azithromycin versus doxycycline for genital chlamydial infection. Studies were identified by searching computerized English-language databases for the period to August , supplemented by a manual bibliographic search. Data were extracted on diagnostic assay, follow-up time, study design, sponsorship, patients' characteristics, adverse events, attrition rates, and outcomes. Twelve trials met the inclusion criteria; patients were evaluated for microbial cure and for adverse events. After pooling of the data, differences in efficacy and risk were computed.

Azithromycin and doxycycline are recommended for treatment of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Azithromycin versus doxycycline for genital chlamydial infections:

genital the versus chlamydial for of azithromycin infection treatment doxycycline

of the versus azithromycin treatment genital doxycycline chlamydial infection for

To compare the economic consequences of doxycycline therapy with those of azithromycin therapy for women with uncomplicated cervical chlamydial infections. Decision analysis in which the health outcomes, costs, and cost-effectiveness of two provider-administered treatment strategies for women with uncomplicated cervical chlamydial infections were compared: Under baseline assumptions, the azithromycin strategy incurred fewer major and minor complications and was less expensive overall than the doxycycline strategy despite a higher initial cost for acquiring antibiotic agents. In univariate azithromycin versus doxycycline for the treatment of genital chlamydial infection analyses, the azithromycin strategy prevented more major complications but was more expensive than the doxycycline strategy when doxycycline effectiveness was greater than 0. In a multivariate sensitivity analysis combining azithromycin versus doxycycline for the treatment of genital chlamydial infection parameter estimates selected so that the cost-effectiveness of the doxycycline strategy would be maximized relative to that of the azithromycin strategy, the azithromycin strategy resulted in fewer complications but was more costly. On the basis of the best available data as derived from the literature and experts, the azithromycin strategy was more cost-effective than the doxycycline strategy for women with uncomplicated cervical cost adderall vs vyvanse infections. Despite the dominance of the azithromycin strategy over the doxycycline strategy, the adoption of the azithromycin strategy may be limited by the practical financial constraints of our currently fragmented health care system, in which the costs and benefits of preventing chlamydia sequelae are often incurred by different components of the system. An Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Infectious DiseaseSexually Transmitted Infections. Sign In Set Up Account.

A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Clinical Azithromycin versus doxycycline for the treatment of genital chlamydial infection Diseases ;59 2: The last review of studies evaluating azithromycin and doxycycline treatment for genital chlamydia took place in These were not significantly different. Diagnostic technology has changed sincewith nucleic acid amplification tests being used instead of culture or enzyme immunoassays. This study was conducted to update the previous meta-analysis from and better determine if azithromycin or 5 htp and adderall interactions is superior for the treatment of genital chlamydia. Only randomized controlled trials, published up to December 31st,were included.

Add Comment:

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Comments:

Recommend FPrime to your librarian or information manager to request an extended free trial for all users at your institution. User comments must be in English, comprehensible and relevant to the article under discussion.

   
9.7

Zita (taken for 1 to 4 years) 15.09.2018

27 users found this comment helpful.
Did you?   Yes   No   |   Report inappropriate

If your institution subscribes to this resource, and you don't have a MyAccess Profile, please contact your library's reference desk for information on how to gain access to this resource from off-campus. Chlamydia trachomatis is responsible for a wide spectrum of clinical disease, particularly in the genital tract see Table 13—1.

   
8.5

Brigitte (taken for 1 to 5 years) 27.02.2018

48 users found this comment helpful.
Did you?   Yes   No   |   Report inappropriate